Bring the records together.
Start with the invoice, agreed terms, appointment, and check-in and release records.
We’re building Adrift to check detention invoices against agreed terms and shipment timestamps. See what supports the charge, where the numbers differ, and what needs follow-up.
An invoice tells you what was billed. The agreement and shipment records help you judge whether it’s supported. Adrift’s planned workflow brings those pieces together.
Start with the invoice, agreed terms, appointment, and check-in and release records.
Apply the clock-start rule, free time, and rate. Compare the result with the amount billed.
Does the agreed clock-start rule apply to this shipment?
Needs a person’s reviewCheck exceptions and missing evidence. Your team decides whether the charge needs follow-up.
The cards show fictional shipment 1042. Follow the full example below.
The example terms support $50. Follow the records and calculation to see why the remaining $100 needs review.
Fictional shipment 1042 · Sample data
The invoice bills 1.5 hours of detention. The next step is to check which time is chargeable under the agreement.
For this example: the clock starts at the later of the appointment or check-in. That means 09:00, even though the truck checked in at 08:00.
The example terms start the clock at 09:00, not the early check-in at 08:00. That supports $50 and leaves a $100 difference for your team to review.
A difference is a review question. Your team confirms the evidence and decides whether to question the charge.
Illustrative preview using fictional records and agreed terms. Actual charges depend on the agreement and complete evidence. A flagged difference is not a confirmed error or a promise of savings.
Explore all four steps · No signupWe’re speaking with operations and finance teams that review detention invoices. Tell us where the work gets stuck and what you’d want a pilot to prove.
Pilot scope and pricing depend on your process, available records, and invoice volume. We’ll discuss those together before agreeing on next steps.
Here’s what we’ll cover:
No published pricing plans yet. Booking a call doesn’t commit you to a pilot.
Availability, evidence, and getting started.
Adrift is in development. The demo uses fictional data to illustrate the review process. We’re currently having discovery and pilot conversations with teams that review detention charges.
Operations and finance teams that review or pay detention invoices at 3PLs, shippers, distributors, and freight brokers—especially teams piecing together the supporting records by hand.
The invoice, applicable agreement and rates, appointment details, and check-in and release records. Other shipment or warehouse records may help explain exceptions or fill gaps.
The planned workflow keeps those gaps visible as open questions. Your team gathers the missing context and confirms the evidence before deciding whether a charge is supported.
No. It means there’s a difference to investigate. Contract exceptions or additional records may explain it. Your team makes the final decision and handles any follow-up.
We’d first discuss your review process, invoice volume, and available records. If there’s a fit, we’ll work through scope, success criteria, and pricing together. There are no published plans yet.
Talk us through a recent invoice and the questions it raised. We’ll explore where Adrift could help.
30 minutes · Discuss your workflow and pilot fit